There are multiple
explanations as to why I’ve left this blog out to die; a failed creative
project quickly lost in an internal tumult of aesthetic perfectionism and
therapeutic baggage. You’d think that the medium would get tired and discard
me, another young man added to the canon-fodder of jaded, and thus inadequate,
bloggers.
God, I hate
that word.
I suppose the
most pressing reason is that I no longer recognise myself in anything that I’ve
ever written; the word contains no truth – in fact, I’d go even further and say
that my words contain nothing at all. I’ve always found it hard to allow
a sentence to breathe for me, preferring instead to suffocate any authentic
trace of myself through my use of language. I wish that I had a grand
explanation for this; a Derridean analysis of differance to somehow justify my
excessive verbosity. But I don’t. And I’m very much aware that I’ve done it again.
The feeling of
alienation seems to be fairly universal; that occasional presence of the lightning
rod, cleaving apart the self from the body and its surroundings, until we can
somehow stand apart from both in abject horror. I mention this because I was
recently reading old diary entries of mine, indulging in old indulgences, when
I realised that they were full of lies. For some inexplicable (or perhaps
crushingly obvious reason), my diary didn’t contain a shred of recognisable
truth. Any genuine feeling, any connection to bodily experience, had been
buried beneath pure style – sad signifiers floating around, used and abused. I’m
sure you can imagine the bodily sensations that followed this realisation.
I suppose that
this piece of writing can be thought of as a means to move past this; an
attempt to write about that which concerns me most. And more pressingly perhaps,
to preserve some feeling in the text. A task that has always seemed too impossible
for me to attempt.
For several years
now, I’ve thought that every life can be measured by a series of encounters –
supple stains upon the self. These can be interpersonal, literary, filmic – it doesn’t
really matter to me – but they are demarked by their ability to tangibly introduce
otherness into our lives. A psychic home invasion perhaps, the introduction of
an unsettling current of life that not only has the potential to take us outside
of ourselves, but further inside, too. This isn’t to say that they necessarily
reveal how things are, akin to some entry into the light of Platonic truth, but
rather, how things aren’t. They reveal the profound contradictions that animate
our lives. The fact that the Other – the invader – has always already been
here.
It is a mark of
my newfound honesty then, which I hope isn’t reading like a desperate
confessional, that I want to share one of the encounters that I’ve had
recently.
In the 1980s,
Christopher Bollas coined the term known unthought to refer to experiences
or introspective gleanings that we know, but we cannot think. These are the thoughts
that continually threaten our psychic housing, teasing the delicately poised
edifice of the mind. These are the thoughts that laugh in the face of the Socratic
injunction to know thyself, for they reveal the impossibility of such an
endeavour. Anyway, I recently stumbled across the poem, A Girl in a Library,
by Randall Jarrell and I’ve been enamoured by a singular line, which may be the
known unthought that I’ve most struggled to grapple with over the course of my
life.
And yet, the
ways we miss our lives is life.
This is the
fundamental fact of self-formulation; in being ourselves, we are not that which
we could have been. Written into the fabric of our lives is the lives that we
don’t have. I’ve yet to meet someone who I think isn’t somewhat haunted by the
possibilities of the alternative future, the enclosure of space, time and selfhood
that arises simply through being ourselves. And yes, I’m aware that I may be
projecting. The lovers we missed by a minute; the conversations caught by the
tongue. We continually have to grapple with the presence of unrealised selves, a
perpetual haunting, in which mourning becomes commonplace. This is impossibly
crushing. And yet, the way that we miss our lives is life.
The writer and
psychoanalyst, Adam Phillips, says that we live our life through a set of quotations.
They form an interior text through which we relate to the world. And then one
day, if they are ever truly integrated, our minds can release the mystery and
they dissipate back into the text. A parallel can be drawn here with the words
of T.S Eliot, in which the end of our exploring will be to arrive where we
started and know the place for the first time. The moment Jarrell stops
reverberating around, stops infiltrating the dark corners, is the moment that I’ve
understood him. Not that I truly believe in the possibility.
I think that
the importance of the poem for me, the stark reflection that it encourages, is
that in our new economy of self-creation, this fantasy of could have been
sometimes operates on an almost transcendental level. The self that walked the
other path; the self that is the best version of who we could be, is the idol
that we begin to worship in our dreams. And the idol constructed with mental
matter (ghostly ectoplasm) is a lot harder to crush than that of clay. In his
text, The Ideology of Modernism, Lukacs writes about our tendency, post
Gods untimely death, to focus our hopes upon a transcendence conceived of as a
pure absence. We cannot dispel this metaphysical shadow, grasping in the
darkness, moving our hands outwards and attempting to claw back something that
can exist in this absence. We clutch at alternative futures, comfort ourselves
in the sheer fact of their (once) possibility, that in Beckett’s words, aid in
this obliteration of an unbearable presence.
This reflection
frames my diary in a new light.
The total
collapse of any recognition arose from the fact that I was writing from the
perspective of one of the men that I’ve missed. A fantasy at the end of a lofty
detour around the potential possibilities of my life. I was writing as someone
that I was not, in order to not be who I am.
I'm afraid to say that there’s no
lofty conclusion here, or any distinguishable lesson. There’s simply a
collection of disparate words that I’ve tried to make as honest to me as
possible. Though, I can already foresee the picture in a few months’ time. I’ll
be sitting and reading this in a state of shaken disgust, recoiling at the
presence of the ghost who guides the hand. The ghost who has ascribed these
words.
Anyway, I don’t
want to end on such a heavy, dramatic note. I’ve always enjoyed the line that the
reason we know Hamlet isn’t mad is because he had more thoughts than one.
And in that
vein, I need to stop thinking about this now.
No comments:
Post a Comment